Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than LG Q60, getting a global score of 79.3 against 73.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an way older cellphone than LG Q60, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and a lot thinner anyway.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a lot better looking screen than LG Q60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The LG Q60 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Q60 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Q60 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots clearer videos and photos than LG Q60, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The LG Q60 has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.