Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than LG Q60's general score of 73.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a notably newer and extremely thinner phone than LG Q60, although it's also extremely heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than LG Q60, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger display, a much brighter display and a lot higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG Q60, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG Q60 features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery performance than LG Q60, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than LG Q60, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.