Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than LG Q7, with an 83.7 score against 72.2. The LG V50 ThinQ is a much heavier phone than LG Q7, but both are equally thin. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The LG V50 ThinQ has a better performing CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than LG Q7, because it has a bigger display, a little bit higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG Q7, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a lot larger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q7, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery performance than LG Q7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.