Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is way better than LG Q7's 72.2 overall score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Galaxy A71 5G is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner phone than LG Q7, but it's extremely heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a screen that is very similar to the display in LG Q7, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than LG Q7, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures much better pictures and videos than LG Q7, because it has a much better video resolution, a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior battery life than LG Q7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.