Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than LG Q7, having a 77.8 score against 72.2. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is way newer and noticeably thinner than the LG Q7's, although it's also extremely heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better screen than LG Q7, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
LG Q7 counts with a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than LG Q7, because it has a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than LG Q7, because it has a 90% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.