Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mirror black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is slightly better than LG Q70's 77.9 score. Despite of the fact the iPhone XS Max is older and a little heavier than the LG Q70, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a faster processing unit than LG Q70, because although it has less cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a brighter display than LG Q70, because it has a little bit better pixel number per display inch, a little higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution and a quite larger display. LG Q70 takes slightly better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier sensor, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The LG Q70 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG Q70 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q70. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG Q70, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.