Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than LG Q70, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 77.9. Google Nexus 6P's body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG Q70, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Google Nexus 6P's processor is just as good as the processing unit in LG Q70, and although the Google Nexus 6P has 1 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG Q70 shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
LG Q70 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q70 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.