Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the LG Q70, with a score of 81.3 against 77.9. Google Pixel XL is a older and a bit thicker cellphone than LG Q70, but Google was able to build it lighter anyway. LG Q70 features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG Q70 also has a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The LG Q70 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and a back camera with a lot higher 32 mega-pixels resolution.
LG Q70 has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q70 features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG Q70, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.