Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than the LG Q70, having a score of 79.1 against 77.9. LG V30's body is way lighter and a bit thinner than the LG Q70, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The LG V30 has a bit better CPU than LG Q70. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG V30 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. The LG V30 counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the LG Q70, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 has improved battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. LG Q70 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
LG V30 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.