Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mirror black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than the LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. The Galaxy A71 5G is a a bit lighter cellphone than LG Q70, but they are 0.32inches thick. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and better performance.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit more memory to install games and applications than LG Q70, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better battery duration than LG Q70, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit more expensive than the LG Q70, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.