Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the LG Q70's global score of 77.9. The Galaxy A80 design is older, heavier and thicker than LG Q70. Galaxy A80 counts with a bit better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A80 features a display that's just as good as the display in LG Q70, because although the Galaxy A80 has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The LG Q70 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. Galaxy A80 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.