Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Mirror black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Even being the best device we compare here, we must tell that it is also older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a little more vivid display than LG Q70, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Note9 also has a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG Q70 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low-light situations, lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
LG Q70 features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note9's battery performance is just as good as the LG Q70 one.
Galaxy Note9 is more expensive than the LG Q70, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.