Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than LG Q70, having a 79.3 score against 77.9. Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a lot older than the LG Q70, it's construction is thinner and incredibly lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher screen density. The LG Q70 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Q70 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG Q70 also has a larger number of cores. LG Q70 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG Q70 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs more than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S6 edge+, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG Q70, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.