Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG Q70 has an overall score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Q70 has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The LG Q70 body is a little lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is noticeably thicker and was released many years before.
LG Q70 counts with a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than LG Q70, because it has a larger display, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a little bit greater screen density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than LG Q70, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q70, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Q70 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.