Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gray | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the LG Q8's 77.2 general score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is way newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than the LG Q8.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper screen than LG Q8, because although it has a way worse display density, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 resolution, much more brightness and a really larger screen. The LG Q8 has a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 12 GB lesser RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications and games than LG Q8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than LG Q8, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than LG Q8, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a lot better video quality, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.