Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2018-06-18 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a general score of 79.1, which is a bit better than LG Stylo 4's 73.1 general score. The LG V30 construction is a little bit thinner and a little lighter than LG Stylo 4, even though it was released only 9 months before. LG V30 has a sharper screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30 has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30 also has more internal memory capacity. LG V30 has just a little better performance than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V30's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery lifetime in LG Stylo 4. LG V30 takes much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, a more mega pixels back facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.