Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than LG Stylo 4, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 73.1. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer than the LG Stylo 4's, although it is a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a greater pixel count in each screen inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a little bit larger display.
LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal storage.
The LG V50 ThinQ has greater battery duration than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 21% larger battery size. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a lot better video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.