Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is better than the LG Stylo 4, having a global score of 86.5 against 73.1. The Galaxy M31 is a newer cellphone than the LG Stylo 4, although it is a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a bit better looking display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a quite higher pixel number in each inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit larger display.
LG Stylo 4 counts with a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31 has a bit better performance than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M31 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a much better camera than LG Stylo 4, because it has a much better video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG Stylo 4, because it has an 82 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.