Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the LG Stylo 4's overall score of 73.1. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than LG Stylo 4, it's notably thinner and noticeably newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, because it has a just a bit greater pixel number per inch of screen, a larger screen and a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. LG Stylo 4 has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery duration than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 73 percent larger battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a way larger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 4. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 4, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.