Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than LG Stylo 6, with a overall score of 80.3 against 76.7. The Google Nexus 6P design is somewhat lighter and thinner than LG Stylo 6, even though it was released 5 years before. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Stylo 6 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
LG Stylo 6 has a bit superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG Stylo 6, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.