Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a overall score of 81.6 against 76.7. The Google Pixel 2 construction is just a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
LG Stylo 6 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 features a processing unit that is just as good as the LG Stylo 6 one, they have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a way better (4K) video quality.
The LG Stylo 6 has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.