Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. The Google Pixel XL is a noticeably lighter phone than the LG Stylo 6, but both of them are equally thin. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density.
LG Stylo 6 has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has more CPU cores. LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel XL captures clearer photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. LG Stylo 6 has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.