Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. Even though the LG V30 is extremely older than LG Stylo 6, it's construction is thinner and extremely lighter. The LG V30 has a little faster processor than LG Stylo 6. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V30 has a little bit better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. The LG V30 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a way better video quality, a better resolution camera and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
The LG V30 features as much storage capacity for applications and games as LG Stylo 6, both of them have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage. The LG Stylo 6 features improved battery performance than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V30, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.