Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Holographic white | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 general score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Moto G Stylus has a more recent 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features. Moto G Stylus's construction is lighter but just a bit thicker than LG Stylo 6, and both were released with only a couple of months difference.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. LG Stylo 6 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite larger screen.
LG Stylo 6 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture.
The LG Stylo 6 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus both have very similar batteries duration.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs more money than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Moto G Stylus, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.