Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an notably older cellphone than LG Stylo 6, but it is thinner and way lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater screen pixel density. The LG Stylo 6 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has a higher number of cores. LG Stylo 6 features greater battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S6 edge+ captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a more mega-pixels camera.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.