Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a score of 77.8 against 76.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is noticeably newer, a bit lighter and thinner than the LG Stylo 6.
LG Stylo 6 has a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than LG Stylo 6, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a just a little higher pixels number in each inch in the screen and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light images, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.