Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than the LG V10, having an 80.3 score against 78.6. Google Nexus 6P's design is thinner and just a bit lighter than LG V10, although they were released with only 1 months difference. Google Nexus 6P features a little faster processing unit than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores.
LG V10 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Nexus 6P. Both of them have a display of the same size, the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. LG V10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, higher video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos.
The LG V10 features a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Nexus 6P features a bit better battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V10, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.