Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the LG V10's global score of 78.6. Google Pixel XL is a lighter cellphone than the LG V10, but both are equally thin. The LG V10 has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440, the LG V10 also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel XL also has a greater number of cores (and faster). The LG V10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V10 also counts with better video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The LG V10 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel XL features just a little better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V10, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.