Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than LG V10's general score of 78.6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it counts with a couple additional features. Motorola Edge 50 is a extremely newer phone, and it is also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than LG V10.
The Motorola Edge 50 and LG V10 both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 50 has a little worse 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen. LG V10 has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V10 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.