Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Gray and White |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the LG V10's global score of 78.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z4 has a more recent 10 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it offers some additional features and some performance improvements. The Moto Z4 is a notably newer device, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than LG V10.
The LG V10 has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Moto Z4 features a bit more powerful processor than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto Z4 also has a larger number of cores.
Moto Z4 features a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a larger aperture, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
LG V10 has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z4 counts with improved battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Moto Z4, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V10, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.