Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is just a bit better than the LG V10, with a global score of 79.9 against 78.6. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, offering lots of additional features and a performance increase. The OPPO Find X3 Pro construction is extremely newer and a little bit thinner than the LG V10's, although it's also just a little heavier.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a quite superior hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. LG V10 counts with a bit better display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a just a bit lower pixels amount per inch of screen, a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a bit smaller screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The LG V10 features a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.