Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 is a bit better than the LG V10, having a score of 80.3 against 78.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A12 has the newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy A12 body is notably newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the LG V10.
The LG V10 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The LG V10 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A12, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a better processor than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has more CPU cores. The Galaxy A12 features a much better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 67% bigger battery size. LG V10 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A12, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.