Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android |
| 2015-10-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than LG V10's 78.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a a lot newer phone than the LG V10, although it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while LG V10 works with Android 5.1 OS.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit better processing power than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores. LG V10 has a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V10 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A32 features a way better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A32 captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V10, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.