Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is slightly better than LG V10, with a overall score of 84.9 against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy A80 is a notably newer device than LG V10, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V10 has a much better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Galaxy A80 features a quite better processing power than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores. The Galaxy A80 has a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The LG V10 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A80 counts with superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.