Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-01 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black and Gold |
| Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than LG V10's 78.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer device, and it is also a bit lighter and way thinner than the LG V10. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing you lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a little better performance than LG V10, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM. LG V10 features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V10 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG V10 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a 16 MP resolution camera, the LG V10 also has a way higher (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture for better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.