Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is slightly better than LG V10, having a overall score of 83.3 against 78.6. Even though the Galaxy M30s is just a little bit thicker than LG V10, it's a little lighter and also newer. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a larger number of faster cores. The LG V10 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The LG V10 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V10 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M30s counts with a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy M30s counts with a way better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.