Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Stainless steel | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V10's 78.6 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ construction is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than LG V10, although they were only released 2 months apart. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 5.1 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a display that's very similar to the LG V10 one, both of them have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a higher count of pixels per display inch and a screen of the same size. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG V10. They have 1 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The LG V10 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a 16 mega pixels resolution and a 0.38 inches sensor, the LG V10 also has a bigger aperture and better video frame rate.
Galaxy S6 edge+ and LG V10 both have quite similar batteries.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V10. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG V10, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.