Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black and White |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a global score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V10 has the previous 5.1 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact the LG V10 is older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a sharper screen than LG V10, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a really larger screen. LG V10 features a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V10, because it has a much better resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V10 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.