Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the LG V20's 77 overall score. Although the Google Pixel and LG V20 were only released with a couple months difference, Google Pixel's construction is lighter but somewhat thicker than LG V20. The Google Pixel and LG V20 feature quite similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The LG V20 has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a little bigger display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. LG V20 features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V20 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
LG V20 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V20, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.