Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than LG V20, having an 80 score against 77. Google Pixel 3's construction is extremely newer and somewhat lighter than the LG V20's, but it's also a little bit thicker. LG V20 features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a bit bigger screen and a bit better display pixels density.
The LG V20 has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V20 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher number of cores.
The LG V20 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V20 also counts with a much better 16 mega pixels resolution camera.
The LG V20 features just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 3 is a better device, it is more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG V20, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.