Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than LG V20, having a general score of 80.7 against 77. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is newer than LG V20, it is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid display than LG V20, because it has a little bit larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V20 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V20 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V20 also counts with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.