Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the LG V20, getting a general score of 78.8 against 77. The Google Pixel 3a is a noticeably newer and lighter phone than LG V20, but it's a little bit thicker. LG V20 has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution, a bit greater pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
LG V20 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a has a little faster CPU than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a also has 4 more cpu cores (but slower).
LG V20 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V20 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 16 megapixels resolution.
The LG V20 features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 3a is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG V20, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.