Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the LG V20's overall score of 77. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is much newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than LG V20. The LG V20 features a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG V20 features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a bit better processor than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a greater number of cores (although slower).
The Google Pixel 3a XL features just a bit longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. LG V20 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the LG V20 also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Although Google Pixel 3a XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG V20, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.