Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than LG V20's 77 global score. The Google Pixel 4 is a a lot newer and just a little lighter phone than the LG V20, although it is also a bit thicker. The LG V20 counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V20 also has a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has more RAM and 4 more processing cores. LG V20 takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
The LG V20 features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V20, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.