Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the LG V20, having a general score of 82.9 against 77. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is much newer than LG V20's, although it's just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid screen than LG V20, because it has a quite better display pixels density, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bit larger display.
The LG V20 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 16% more battery capacity. LG V20 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V20 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V20, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.