Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than LG V20's score of 77. The Google Pixel 4a is a newer and somewhat lighter phone than LG V20, but it is a little bit thicker. LG V20 counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM. The LG V20 takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos and a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG V20 also counts with a camera with a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V20 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 has just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V20, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.