Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than LG V20, getting an 87.5 score against 77. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is way newer and a little bit lighter, but a little thicker than the LG V20. The LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit better display pixel density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better CPU than LG V20, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM. LG V20 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lot worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V20, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.