Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than the LG V20, getting a global score of 89 against 77. The Google Pixel 5 design is way newer and somewhat lighter than LG V20's, but it is also just a little bit thicker. The LG V20 features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
LG V20 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 features just a little better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 5 has better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 28% larger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better camera than LG V20, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a much lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.