Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, getting a general score of 77 against 77. Even though LG V20 and HTC U Ultra were released only a couple of months apart, LG V20's construction is just a little thinner but a little heavier. HTC U Ultra features a display that's just as good as the LG V20 one, both of them have a screen of the same size, the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px and the same display pixel density.
The HTC U Ultra's processor is just as good as LG V20's CPU, both have 4 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. HTC U Ultra's storage for games and applications is just as good as the LG V20 one, both of them have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal internal memory.
LG V20 has just a little bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG V20 and the HTC U Ultra both count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the HTC U Ultra has a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower video resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V20 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.