Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than LG V20's general score of 77. The LG G8X ThinQ is a notably newer phone than the LG V20, but it is a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V20 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The LG G8X ThinQ features a greater memory for games and applications than LG V20, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a worse video resolution and a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The LG G8X ThinQ features longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.